Apparently, Hillary got mad in the Congo and showed real emotion. Those tears during the primaries though? Probably not real? So she can be mad because she is perceived as a b^%ch, but show some stereotypically female emotion involving tears and it cannot be true? Whatevs.
"Did her eyes well up with real or manufactured tears right before the New Hampshire primary? The truth about that moment is still up for debate...But there is no doubt that Clinton’s pique was very real in Africa, when she replied testily to a question from a Congolese college student."
Apparent take-home message: Anger makes her human and tears make her a faker.
Link is in the comments if you care. :-)
This is not meant to be a commentary on Hillary, but rather how people chose to interpret what they witness/hear about/see reported/remember things.
2 comments:
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/08/13/
hillarys_human_moment/
Personally I think all Politicians lie and manipulate people by emotion real or fake. With all the insane crap happening in the Congo I will believe these are real emotions.
Post a Comment